|
Safety and Buildings Division Plumbing
Advisory Code Council Meeting Summaries
Meeting
summaries are considered drafts until approved by council members at a
subsequent meeting. --------------------------------------
Plumbing Advisory Code Council
meeting, April 17, 2008,
9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., Thompson Bldg, rm 3C, Madison, Wisconsin
Council
Members Attendance: Arthur J. Biesek - P; Thomas Boehnen - P;
Patrick Casey - P; Hallet Jenkins - P; Dave Jones - A; Gary Kowalke -
A; Jeff Kuhn - P; Rudolf Petrowitsch - P; Gene Shumann - P; David Viola
- A; Joseph Zoulek - P.
S&B Staff
Attendance: Tom Braun, Lynita Docken, Jim Miller, Todd
Taylor, Jerry Thompson.
Other
Attendance: Jeff Beiriger, Plumbing Heating and Cooling Contractors;
Tim Elverman, Local 75, Matthew Marcinak, International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials. Council
meeting summaries from April 2 and January 9 were approved.
There were no "Division Updates" from S&B staff.
The
council did a section by section review of 44 pages of draft code
language. The resulting decisions are reflected in draft
proposals for public hearing on July 8, 2008, in Madison. The
hearing draft language and hearing announcement are on the S&B
WebSite, http://commerce.wi.gov/SB/SB-CodeDevelopment.html#Comm81845
Lynita
Docken explained the possible steps in the code change process. -
Council considerations - Drafting proposals by S&B
staff - Council considerations - Drafting
proposals by S&B staff - Public Hearing (July 8,
2008) - Consideration of hearing comments by S&B
staff -
Possible council meeting to finalize draft proposals to go to the state
legislature for committee considerations. Hope is
for this
to happen before September 1, 2008.
Meeting adjourned.
April 2, 2008, 9:30 a.m. to
2:30 p.m., Thompson Bldg, rm 3B, Madison, Wisconsin
Council
Members Attendance: Arthur J. Biesek - P; Thomas Boehnen - P;
Patrick Casey - P; Hallet Jenkins - P; Dave Jones - P; Gary Kowalke -
A; Jeff Kuhn - P; Rudolf Petrowitsch - A; Gene Shumann - A; David Viola
- A; Joseph Zoulek - P.
S&B Staff
Attendance:
Lynita Docken, Don Hough, Bruce Meiners, Jim Miller, Todd Taylor, Bob
DuPont, Debra Miller (Commerce).
Other
Attendance:
Dajen Bohacek, Plumbing Mechanical and Sheet Metals Contractors; Jeff
Beiriger, Plumbing Heating and Cooling Contractors; Alan Thomas, Cat
Iron Soil Pipe Institute; Tom Cottreau, City of Milwaukee; Richard
Husar, City of Milwaukee; Jeff Boldt, Wisconsin Healthcare Engineering
Assoc.; Wes Zastrow, Local 75.
The January 9
council meeting
summary was not approved. It will be considered at the next
meeting, which was set for April 17 in Madison.
Division
Update -
Lynita Docken said a public hearing could be scheduled in May if the
council feels the proposed revision package is ready. - She
noted
a planned report concerning plumbing product aspects of the code
revisions was being postponed until the April 17 meeting due to
S&B
staff turnover. - A Soil and Stormwater Code Advisory
Council will start
meeting in May to considered erosion control and post construction
stormwater issues. - The Bio-Safety Laboratory subgroup has
met. Discussions of the topic have not reached the point of
code
language proposals - S&B and the Department of
Natural Resources are working on a Memorandum of Understanding
concerning stormwater issues. -
Jim Miller said printing of administrative forfeiture forms and staff
training has delayed the plumbing licensing-violation citation
deployment. A draft table was given to the council members
outlining code references related to the forfeiture system.
Meeting attendees requested some sort of public reports in the future
concerning citations issued. S&B will maintain a
computer
database of citations. - Bruce Meiners has been hired as a
plumbing plan reviewer in La Crosse. Jerry Thompson is now in
Madison as a Plumbing Product Evaluator, the position formerly held by
Mike Beckwith. Beckwith has returned for a short period of
time
to provide training as a limited term employee. - Air
Admittance
Valves: Jim Miller said proposed changes to the approval status of air
admittance values have been postponed because a manufacturer challenged
the process. AAV are still approved as an alternate system
and
can be installed when meeting all stipulations. A hearing
before
an administrative law judge is scheduled for July. Council
members requested ample notice of any further actions on the subject. -
Jeff Beiringer requested S&B keep itself aware of and involved
in
legislation concerning the proposed Great Lakes Water Compact. -
Council members expressed concern over March 1 Commercial Building Code
changes that affected waterless hand washing in some public
buildings. Bob DuPont said the issue is being reconsidered
and
may be changed during upcoming commercial building code work. -
DuPont reported on recent law changes that will affect S&B:
- Statewide licensing of electricians, with a 5-year phase-in required.
- The Wisconsin prohibition on outdoor heating sidewalks was rescinded.
- A superinsulation requirement for one- and two-family
dwellings heated with electricity was repealed.
- Rules were tightened against conflicts of interest among county
employees involved in POWTS programs.
-Carbon monoxide detectors in certain buildings were mandated, as was
development of a detector inspection system. - DuPont
reviewed
possible plumbing plan review changes in Comm 2, part of the first
consideration of fee changes since 2000. Because law requires
different S&B programs to (for the most part) be supported by
their
own fees, increases will vary across programs. Plumbing
license
fees cannot be increased, so the need to pay for S&B plumbing
programs over the next four years will be supported by an average 26
percent proposed increase in plan review fees. A public
hearing
on various S&B fee code language is tentatively planned for
June.
Multipurpose Piping Systems Don
Hough presented information to the council on MPPs, including a
recommendation that Wisconsin adopt the recent 2007 NFPA 13D
standard. He also suggested consideration of the definition
of
what is part of an MPP. Lynita Docken will bring specific
code
language to the council for the April 17 meeting.
More
discussion of draft code language revisions in Comm 80-86 was begun.
Discussion is to continue at the April 17 meeting, along with a review
of miscellaneous code change revisions.
January
9, 2008, 9:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., Tommy G. Thompson Commerce
Center, 201 W. Washington, Room 3C, Madison, Wisconsin
Council Member Attendance
Art
Biesek - League of WI Municipalities (Present), Thomas Boehnen - Amer.
Society of Plumbing Engineers (Chair) (Present), Patrick Casey - WI
State AFL-CIO (Present), Hallet Jenkins - City of Milwaukee (Present),
Dave Jones - Technical Advisor (Excused), Gary Kowalke - PHCC/MPA WI
Assoc. (Absent), Jeff Kuhn - Plbg., Mech., & Sheet Metal
Contractors Alliance (Present), Rudolph Petrowitsch - Amer. Society of
Sanitary Engineers, WI Chapter (Excused), Gene Shumann - Shumann
&
Assoc. (Present), David Viola - Plbg. Manufacturers Institute (Absent),
Joseph Zoulek - PHCC/MPA WI Assoc.
(Present)
Alternates and Guest
Attemdance: Jeff
Rasmussen – M.P. Oshkosh, Tom Cottreau – City of
Milwaukee,
Richard Husan – City of Milwaukee, Alan Thomas –
CISPI,
Bill Woehlke – AB & I Foundry, Bob Smith –
Deery-Pardue
& Associates, Jeff Beiriger – Plumbing, Heating,
Cooling
Contractors Association
Department of Commerce
Staff: Docken,
Lynita – Program Development Bureau, Amanda Berry –
Program
Development Bureau, Jim Miller – Integrated Services
Bureau P
Welcome,
Introductions and Review of Agenda: Thomas
Boehnen opened the meeting by welcoming the Council. He
reviewed the agenda for the meeting.
Review
Progress Report: Thomas Boehnen reviewed the
progress report from the December 5, 2007 meeting. The
Council accepted the report as written.
Division
Updates: Lynita Docken updated the members on
legislative and Division activity: •
Mike Beckwith, a product reviewer for Safety & Buildings, will
be
retiring at the end of January. A replacement has not yet
been
hired. • There is a
new plumbing plan reviewer in LaCrosse. •
Forfeiture and tracer wire rules have passed through the legislature
and are ready for adoption. Although there is not an adoption
date, agency staff have been preparing and training for the new code to
go into effect. •
A statement of
scope is currently being written regarding certification for cross
connection surveyors, and a certification requirement for pool
contractors.
Discuss code revision suggestions
for plumbing products and adoption of standard revisions: Mike
Beckwith discussed the 2007 update to standards in the code
changes. He explained that the State of Wisconsin adopts
parts of
multiple codes. Codes are updated as needed or as soon as
possible after the new editions of these standards are
released.
Some of the changes from previously-adopted standards include: •
The term ballcock has been changed to anti-siphon fill valve. •
The cast iron standards will be updated and the CISPI standards, which
are currently in the code will be included in this update. •
Water heater drain valves standard has been withdrawn, but they still
must meet general material and pressure requirements, which are located
under 84.30 (4) and (5).
Lynita Docken and Jim
Miller discussed the following proposed code changes: •
Comm 82.31 (3) (b) is not proposed to be changed to require a
3”
sewer vent for manufactured homes because they are regulated by the
federal government. •
Comm 82.30 (11) (f)
2. is proposed to be changed to codify the
allowance for
the corporation cock and dresser coupling to be eliminated for
pressurized sewers. Lynita Docken will return with
modifications
to the current code language. •
A
note is proposed to be added to Comm 81.01 which will provide
definitions for parking structures. Definitions are already
included in the building code. •
Comm 82.33
(8) is proposed to not be changed to expand the receptor
choices
to include the riser of any receptor. Currently the riser of
a
floor drain, laundry tray and kitchen sink trap are all permitted to be
the receptor of an indirect receptor. •
1
¼” cleanout size is proposed to serve 1
¼”
pipe and would be included in Table 82.35. •
In Comm 82.30 (10) (a) 1, the term sewage is proposed to replace the
term wastewater. •
In Table 82.30-3, 1 1/2” building drain is proposed to be
added
to the column “Pipe Diameter”.
Council
discussion of miscellaneous issues: Jeff
Beiriger presented an issue to the Council concerning the statute
proposal concerning how to define the term
“plumbing”. Currently, plumbing is used
in a variety
of ways: a verb, an adjective, and a noun. There was a
request to
consider using plumbing as a noun, and replacing the other types of
usage with different words.
Set next meeting
adjourn: The next PACC meeting is
scheduled for:
February 6, 2008, 9 a.m. - 2:30 p.m., Thompson
Commerce Center, Room 3C, 201 W. Washington, Ave.,
Madison, Wisconsin.
Another meeting is
scheduled for:
April 2, 2008 at 9 a.m. - 2:30 p.m.,
Thompson Commerce Center, Room 3B, 201 W.
Washington, Ave., Madison, Wisconsin.
[These minutes are subject to
approval at a future meeting of the Council.]
Wednesday,
December 5, 2007, 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Tommy
G. Thompson Commerce Center, Third Floor Conference Room #3B, 201 W.
Washington Ave., Madison, Wisconsin
COUNCIL
MEMBER ATTENDANCE: Art Biesek (Excused), Thomas Boehnen
(Present), Patrick Casey (Present), Hallet
Jenkins (Absent), Gary Kowalke (Absent),
Jeff Kuhn (Absent), Rudolph Petrowitsch (Excused), Gene
Shumann (Present), David Viola (Absent),
Joseph Zoulek (Present)
VISITORS: Scott
Hamilton, Local 75; Matthew Marciniak, IAPMO; Loretta Trapp, Clack
Corporation; Dan Bartz, Kohler Co.; Phil Schrieber, Kohler Co.; Victor
Hines, Jr., Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Co.; Rich Davison, Stickler
& Assoc.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE STAFF: Lynita
Docken, Program Development Bureau; Amanda Berry, Program Development
Bureau; Mike Beckwith, Integrated Services Bureau
Welcome
and Introductions: Thomas Boehnen opened the meeting with a
round of introductions.
Period of
Public Comment: Representatives from Kohler presented
information to the Council concerning the installation, maintenance,
cost, and model variations of waterless urinals. Docken
stated that some manufacturers’ waterless urinals have
submitted for and received an alternate approval under Comm
84. Currently the trap diameter of waterless
urinals that have been submitted for approval does not meet the
requirement of a 2-inch trap in Comm 82.30. The Council
recommended modifying the code in chs. Comm 82 and 84 to
include waterless urinals as a code compliant option.
Division
Updates: Lynita Docken updated the members on legislative
and Division activity: •
The Department of Natural Resources and the Office of the Governor is
in the process of developing conservation standards to serve as a model
for states in the Great Lakes Basin. The DNR will hold a
meeting in the spring to discuss the plan. Groups
interested in participating in the development of the plan should
contact Jill Jonas of the DNR. •
The Forfeiture Rules are currently at the legislature. The
committees received the draft during the last week of November. •
The code changes to the building code have been accepted by the
legislature. Included in the building code revisions are
requirements for sprinkler systems in three- and four-family buildings
after the
year 2010. At that time, the code would permit multipurpose
piping systems as an option for these types of occupancies.
Discussion
of Code Revision Suggestions for Softener Sizing: •
Loretta Trapp from the Clack Corporation proposed code changes to Comm
81-84, which would change sizing requirements for softener heads, to
the Council for consideration. The Council recommended the
code be revised to permit the use of the conversion table contained in
the current alternate approval.
Recommendations
for Plumbing Product Code Revisions: •
Comm 82.40, relating to water supply systems, should be changed to
require the rough in of water distribution piping for waterless urinals. •
Comm 84.20(5)(o)2., relating to water closets, should be changed to
allow an exception for prison fixtures to be installed without hinged
seats. • Mike
Beckwith discussed the possible changes to cast iron standards and
whether the current code should reflect the 2005 ASTM standards or the
2005 CISPI standards. He suggested that since Comm 84
references both the ASTM and CISPI, both should be adopted.
The ??????? •
Comm 84.30, Table 84.30-2, relating to underground drain and vent pipe,
should be changed to remove concrete as an acceptable material. •
Table 84.10, Submittals to Department, should be changed to delete the
requirements for the submission of exterior grease interceptors for
product review.
The next meeting of the Plumbing
Advisory Code Council is scheduled for:
Wednesday,
January
9, 2008 at 9:00 a.m.
Tommy G. Thompson Commerce
Center Third
Floor Conference Room #3C 201 West Washington Ave. Madison,
WI
Mike
Beckwith is planning to attend the next
code council meeting to further discuss plumbing product issues and
adopted standard updates. He will order A112.19.19, relating
to
the standards for waterless urinals, for the committee to review.
If
you have any
questions, please contact Lynita Docken at (608) 785-9349 or email at
lynita.docken@wisconsin.gov.
October 24, 2007,
Thompson
Commerce Center, Madison, Wisconsin
Attending:
Tom Cottreau, Hal Jenkins, Richard Husar, Pat Casey, Gene Shumann,
Rudolf Petrowitsch, Joe Zoulek, Tom Boehnen, Don Oremus, Lynita Docken,
Jim Miller
The meeting was called to order by
Tom Boehnen at 9:08 a.m.
There was
no public comment.
There was discussion on the
law in Minnesota that took effect on January 1, 2007 outlawing air
admittance valves and waterless urinals.
Correction:
Meeting of September 24, the meeting was called to order at noon, not
9:10 am.
Department Update Update
on Air Admittacnce Valves. Went to American Society of
Sanitation Engineers meeting and contributed to suggested changes to
the standard. The department is going to a specific site on
October 29, to test the AAV’s to see if there are concerns
with the existing devices. The tests will be
filmed.
S&B is still working
on documentation regarding the usage of AAV’s in
Wisconsin.
Lynita
attended a World Environmental Federation Technical
Exhibition and Conference that discussed climate change,
water resources, grease interceptors, etc.
A
PowerPoint that was used at the recent plumbing inspectors meeting was
shared with the committee. The inspectors were
asked if they were on the code committee, how they would respond to the
questions.
S&B is setting up
appointments to interview candidates for the Lacrosse plan review
position. We continue to be more behind on next available
appointment than we wish. The reviewers are on overtime again.
Mike Beckwith is retiring in
February of 08. S&B has been given approval to hire
someone before he leaves so Mike can train them.
S&B
is continuing to work on the adoption of the tracer wire and
administrative forfeiture rules. Possible adoption may be in
the beginning of 2008.
A
motion was made by Gene Shuman that plan reviewers and plumbing
consultants should be paid an average union wage that is currently
received by a licensed Journeyman plumber. Motion was
seconded by Rudy P. Vote was taken and it was unanimously
passed.
The committee
asked that they be involved in the development of what is considered in
conflict of interest.
The committee
then discussed the issues as listed in the “proposed drain
and vent code changes”.
Next
meetings are: December 5, January 9 and February 6
. Start time is 9 a.m., and will conclude at 2:30
pm.
The meeting was concluded at
2:30.
Tuesday, June 20,
2007, Thompson Commerce Center, Madison,
Wisconsin
Members:
Biesek, Arthur / League of Wisconsin Municipalities - A;
Boehnen,
Thomas / American Society of Plumbing Engineers – Wisconsin -
Chair - P; Casey, Patrick / Wisconsin AFL-CIO - P;
Jenkins,
Hal / City of Milwaukee - P; Jones, Dave / Technical Advisor
- P; Kowalke, Gary / PHCC/MPA Wisconsin - A; Kuhn,
Jeff /
Plumbing, Mechanical and Sheet Metal Contractors Alliance - P;
Petrowitsch, Rudolf / Society of Sanitary Engineers, Wisconsin Chapter
- P; Shumann, Gene / Shumann and Assoc.
- P; Viola,
David / Plbg. Manufacturers Institute - A; Zoulek,
Joseph /
Plumbing Heating and Cooling Contractors - A.
Department
of Commerce, Safety and Buildings Division Staff: Beckwith,
Mike; Docken, Lynita; Miller, Jim; Oremus,
Don; Delfosse, Herman; Zickert, Jim.
Alternates
and Guests: Davison, Rich / Watts Regulator; Husar,
Richard /
City of Milwaukee; Stein, Joe / Madison Water Utility. P/A/Ex/Alt
= present, absent, excused, sent alternate.
The
meeting was called to order by Tom Boehnen, chair, at 9:03 am.
Public
Comment Period: There was no public comment.
-
Commerce Update – Rule
package for forfeiture and tracer wire is in the secretaries’
office. Copies of this document will be given to the members.
Update was given on filling the
general plumbing consultant and general plumbing plan reviewer.
-
Discussed the definition of plumbing regarding storm systems.
Hydraulically connected to a building through a 100 year storm it would
be one definition. Pat brought up the idea of having a
license
exemption to allow landscapers to put in culverts, but it is considered
plumbing. Jeff B. stated that the law should reflect what we
are
doing which would mean to change the code to reflect the fact that
storm inlets on property without buildings would be considered plumbing.
- Discussed the recent
news of a contaminated well in Door County.
-
Discussed use of air admittance valves. There are 3
options: To rescind approval, list them as experimental or
add
conditions to the current approval. The committee was asked
to
send Don Oremus any information they have regarding valve use (failure
or proper operation) by July 20. With this
information
S&B will make a decision on how these products will be
regulated
within Wisconsin.
-
Discussed Bio Safety Labs. Next meeting of the BSL safety
group
is July 10 at the AEI Company office to go over the
installation/construction concerns.
- Discussed proposed code
changes including backflow protection definitions and
methods.
-
It was decided that the department will gather information on the idea
of requiring containment for specific buildings as currently required
by American Water Work Association.
The
committee
meeting ended at 2:20 p.m. The next meetings are scheduled to
be
held on August 15 and October 17. [This summary is subject to approval
at a future meeting of the council.]
Tuesday,
February 27, 2007,
Tommy G. Thompson Commerce Center - Madison,
Attendees:
Biesek, Arthur / League of Wisconsin Municipalities - P;
Boehnen,
Thomas / Amer. Society of Plumbing Engineers - P; Casey, Patrick /
AFL-CIO - P; Jenkins, Hal / City of Milwaukee - P; Jones, Dave
/ -
P; Kowalke, Gary / Plumbing Heating and Cooling Contractors - A; Kuhn,
Jeff / Plbg., Mech., and Sheet Metal Contractors - P;
Petrowitsch,
Rudolf / Amer. Society of Sanitary Engineers - P; Shumann, Gene /
Shumann & Assoc. - P; Viola, David / Plbg. Manufacturers
Institute
- A; Zoulek, Joseph / PHCC - P.
Safety and
Buildings Division Staff: Docken, Lynita; Kaminski, Roman; Miller, Jim;
Oremus, Don; BeckWisconsinth, Mike
Vistors:
Tom Couttreau/City of Milwaukee; David Daniels/Radon Specialists of
Wisconsin; Bill Woehlke/AB&I Foundtry; Stein, Joe /
Madison
Water
Utility; Husar, Richard / City of Milwaukee; Thomas, Alan / Cast Iron
Soil Pipe Institute; Piskula, Jim / Badgerland Trading Co;
Gregg Carr/ AB & I Foundry; Joe
Herkowski/
Herkowski Sales; Jason Schnell /LGD/ASPE; Gary Duren /Code Compliance,
Inc; Bob Harley/ National Survey & Engineering; Tim Elverman
/Local
75; Jim Piskula, /Badgerland Trading; Tom Beckey, Oatey Co; Mathew
Marciniak /IAPMO; Jeff Beiriger / Cook and Franke.
1.
The meeting was called to order by Tom Boehnen, chair. at 9:15 am.
2.
Public Comment Period Tom
Heine, Radon Scientist provided information to the code council on
concerns about the requirements in the plumbing code for venting
clearwater sumps that serve as a receptor for foundation drainage and
also serve as a vessel for radon elimination from buildings.
Tom
Boehnen asked the radon group to work with department staff to
develop
recommendations for code revisions to the council at a future meeting.
It
was requested by Joe Stein that we start a separate committee to start
working on them now as there are many being done in the Madison
area. We asked committee and they agreed to the
concept.
Volunteers included Gene Shumann, Joe Stein, and Pat Casey.
Bill
Wilke talked about cast iron pipe material requirements in the
code. He and others are attempting to meet current CISPI and
ASTM
standards. He stated what current standards require
to be
met for cast iron. He is stating that Wisconsin
Plumbing Code
standards need to be updated to recognize new construction
methods. Wisconsin is allowing "sub-standard"
materials to be
used
as we have not updated the newest standard. 2007 standard is
in
publication right now. Mike Beckwith stated that we
need to
update them and that we have a plan to do so. If we need
input on
the new standard we can contact the cast iron industry individuals
attending the meeting for assistance. The new standard
includes
standards for labeling in more detail so it can be determined which
foundry made it and also requires testing of raw materials and finished
product for radiation.
3. Tom Boehnen. asked
for review
and a motion to accept the progress report from the December
meeting. The motion was made by Pat Casey and seconded by
Rudy
Petrowitsch
4. Commerce Update Lynita
Docken
reported that long time employee of Safety and Buildings, Jim Wehinger,
passed away this month and will be greatly missed by the
Department and
the cross connection control industry.
The draft
of direct
forfeiture is ready. It was handed out. We want to
table
discussion on this matter until other subjects are gone over by people
who are in attendance at today’s meeting.
Tracer
wire
requirements have been requested to be included in the code change and
possibly an emergency rule to address the how’s and
why’s
of
installation. Tom Couttreau. said there was a meeting with
digger’s hotline and the installation methods of this seems
to be
very
confusing. A meeting was set up for this Friday to discuss
options and suggestions.
Don
Oremus gave an
update on the
Hepvo valve. A waterless trap, it was installed in his house
for
two months. Looking at possible experimental installation in
the
Madison area. We can put a number of conditions on it if
necessary. Don Oremus passed out some handouts on World
Health
Association. Gary Duran talked about its use. He
represents
this product. They applied for an alternate, but due to
recent
conversations with the department, the request is now
experimental. After a number of months of use, they will come
back to the council with the results. Rudy asked about
grease
usage with this product. Don O. said they are careful
about
use
of grease in their home while he used it. Gary said there
have
been modifications made since Don has used this in his house.
Jim
Miller talked about web scheduling and getting plans done.
Also that training is completed tomorrow.
Tom
Boehnen. brought up air admittance valves. Don Oremus brought
up
information on them at the last meeting. Discussion was to
continue.
5. Air Admittance Valve Discussion Don
Oremus reported that there may be concern with positive or
negative
pressures in the room as compared with exterior atmospheric
pressures.
Randy
Dahmen, Safety and Buildings commercial building plan reviewer and HVAC
specialist, talked about pressure differentials in buildings.
He
stated that the home furnace has a static pressure of positive
one-quarter inch. This is the standard positive
pressure.
Buildings may be under negative pressure because of exhaust fans and
there is not enough make up air to compensate. Some buildings
should be under negative pressure. A garage for example, and
then
are there buildings that should carry a positive pressure.
How
much negative or positive pressure should be in a building?
Dahmen stated that it’s best to have a positive
pressure.
Question
was asked on what the exact issue was. Boehnen questioned if
there are enough concerns over the use of AAV to not include them in
the code draft, or should we keep them as an alternate.
Docken
talked about hospital staff had concerns on pressure differences in
health care. The pressure in a small room could be
the same
as in the duct work. Two-inch difference on the outlet of the
trap, or 4 inches on the inlet the water could go up the inlet of the
drain.
Jim Piscula talked about
documented failures
that they have on record. He checked since the last meeting,
and
in 2006 they had a return of 30 to 40 valves to Studor. There
was
about 30,000 valves sold in 2006 in Wisconsin. Then he
tested
the
ones that were returned to Studor and 99 percent of the these tested
fine. He stated it did not make a major difference whether or
not
they keep them in the code or as an alternate.
Dahmen
came back to talk about a small room, could it be under the same amount
of pressure in the small room as it is in the ductwork? Randy
said that the supply needs to be approximately the same as the
exhaust. Gary asked if one-quarter inch pressure differential
is
a lot. Randy said, “No, it can vary”.
Talked
about
static negative pressure, the question was asked how long the valve has
been tested under negative pressure. Beckwith said he
believed it
was for 10 minutes It was asked what would happen if the
valve
was under negative pressure for an extended period of time (24)
hours? They did not know. Then we looked at a
positive
pressure difference. The valve will open open at
.3.
Have the valves been tested under continuous positive
pressure?
They said they have not. Room condition
could
get to .3
in the room, both negative and positive. Will the
valve work
if
it has been open for 6 months? Will it work after these
pressures are
taken off? Piskula. said that the valve seat goes
up and
down a little each time the valve is used. If it is kept
open, will dust accumulate in the seat?
Dahmen.
said
under diverse
occupancies it could be subject to higher
pressures. It is
all relative depending on the type of building. Will
the
valve
open sooner than .3, if so, what is the valve actually opening up
at? Tom Beckey said Oatey opens between .2 and
.3.
Beckey also said there is no sewer gas in either positive or negative
pressure case. They said there should be no gurgle
complaints. Oremus. stated that after two years, his valve
stayed
shut because of suds, he thinks. Oatey has been selling since
them since 1998 and has not noticed any problems. Oremus.
said
that because he is a plumber he noted that the drain was flowing
slower. If there is a clog downstream, Beckey stated they
should
take the valve off and put a plastic bag on the opening and note if it
expands or is sucked in when water is discharged into it. If
it
expands, it is because of a clogged drain.
Shumann
asked if we approve the waterless trap, do we need an air admittance
valve? They are not approved for any building that has a
continuous pressure for more than 12 hours. Should we address
what the positive pressure should be instead of just saying a
“positive” pressure in our approval, the answer is
“yes”. How
much should we allow? Should we allow all, or not define it
at
all.
The code committee wants to
know if they should
be codified with buildings that have both negative and positive
pressures. Can suds come up the sink drain when the valve is
stuck open?
Beckey said water would not go down
the drain if
the building is under negative pressure. But, if you put
enough
water down the drain, the valve would open. The question is,
is
it equivalent to an open vent?
Boehnen asked if
any other
issues needed to be brought up. Zoulek talked about hot
water,
and an AAV was being used on a grease interceptor installation and the
condensate locked the seat in place and he had to slam it to get it
going again. When does the surface tension lock the gasket in
place. It was asked by Boehnen if a vacuum test was done to
see
when the AAV would open. Zoulek did not do a
pressure
test. There has been a test conducted in the standard it is
approved under to freeze the AAV and it still had to work.
Beckey
said you could not build up water on the valve. The valve was
put
on a 3-inch vent on top of the roof.
Boehnen
said
we are at a point where we need to decide on recommendation on the
AAV. Are we going to proceed with putting it in the
code, or
stay
status quo? He did not hear of any health related
problems.
Docken reminded that options include everything from pulling it to
writing it in the code. Shumann asked Beckey about
numbers
of failures in Wisconsin. Beckey stated he is not the
rep and
does not know the numbers in Wisconsin. Beckey said
they have
more than 5 million in the field, they are ISO approved and have a
database for failures. He thinks there have been 18 returned,
and
when they tested them many of the 18 worked. Beckey said the
southeast is where most of the valves are being installed.
Minnesota is where the valves are not allowed. Beckey is not
aware of when or if that state will approve it.
Jim
Peters stated that they are doing a
private survey done by health dept personnel, as to what contaminants
are in sewer gas and what levels of it would effect someone.
The
valve was approved for two months but the approval was
pulled.
Minnesota does not require a license in cities over 5000 to install
plumbing. Michigan approved the AAV prior to
Wisconsin.
Couttreau
stated he thinks it is fine now, and not a good idea to codify
it. He cannot buy into the process of allowing it by
rule.
He thinks there are too many things that change over time.
Couttreau
made a motion to leave the AAV as an alternate approval for anther
5-year period. Rudy seconded the motion. Docken
said we
cannot leave it in the approval that they cannot be used under a
positive pressure situation. This would have to be changed if
we
leave it as is. Alternate says subject to a positive pressure
for
more than 12 continuous hours. Boehnen says he
does not
want to go over this all again in 5 years, he thinks we should just
keep it at 5-year terms.
Motion
passed. It was recommended to keep it as an
alternate.
Oremus
discussed a questionnaire for the plumbing industry which would
document when the AAV fail. The form includes
plumber’s
name,
license number, if you installed it with a test, any consumer
complaints, etc. Jim P. said we could take it one step
further to
ask if the product could be evaluated by the manufacturer to see if it
is really working or not. Piskula stated any time there is a
bad
valve, they get it. He said he will give us this
information. Shumann stated that they should send them two
valves for each one they sent in that they think is bad.
Piskula
said they would consider this. Beckey said the same that they
would be willing to test the valves that we are getting to see
if they
are working or not. He thanked the committee for listening to
him
today.
6. Administrative Forfeiture Docken
presented handout on administrative forfeiture. This is for
anything in 145.06.
Oremus.
thinks the fee is too low
for the first offense.
Elverman,
stated he worked on this legislation to get it through. He
stated
the legislators did not want the fine more than $2000. He thinks a $100
fine is not enough to make anyone pay attention. Boehnen
asked
about item 2, in the design profession, they are having a difficult
time finding qualified people to do the work. Does plumbing
have
the same problem in finding people to be plumbers? Casey said
there are apprentices who are ready to go to work, but there are not
enough of JP to do the work.
Elverman
said that as
we gave the authority to state inspectors, the discretion ability would
be tough to determine what to charge. However, he thinks
there
would be fewer appeals if the price was set. If fines were
not
set, people would appeal why they got the $500 fine versus the $1000
fine.
These rules do not affect the
Utility Contractor. Can we write a rule that would fine
them?
Fee amounts were changed in
the draft. Lynita has these changes in her draft.
There
is no statute of limitations regarding the time period between
violations.
7. Code Changes
Discussion In
82.21, the council discussed existing systems
language.
Does a yard hydrant, that was installed back when we allowed them to be
served by an 9d and hose connection vacuum breaker need to be brought
up to current rules? The department currently allows it to
remain
if the installation was done when the code allowed it. This is similar
to dental units which we allowed a ASSE 1012 at one time. How
does the inspector know if the installation was done when the code
allowed it? Should there be dates installed in the rule
stating
when rules changed as noted above so we know when the inspector can
require them to update it?
Petrowitsch
wants to know
why we change the code if there is no good reason to say what was legal
before could not be proven to be bad.
Jeff
Beiriger
spoke about the tracer wire law. He is a lobbyist that
was
involved in drafting this legislation. He stated that at this
point that there is no clear rule on how it should be done.
They
did not want separate rules written in each municipality stating how it
should be done. The challenge is to get some uniformity on
how
these rules should be enforced. He wants any interested
parties
to show up and give their knowledge to how this should be
done.
The questions he raised are:
What is gauge
of & composition of it. Q)
What
should
the color be for the wire, (blue for sanitary and red for
water)
Q)
What about coating of wire Q ) What about
splices.
They should be waterproof, wire nuts are not acceptable Q)
Does the tracer need to be attached, above it, below it, etc. Q)
Where should it be terminated, curb, property line, where?
Outside of the building, Q) Should the system be
tested? Q) If it is not installed, who
writes the orders and who is responsible to put it in.
Meeting
concluded at 2:40pm. [These minutes are subject
to approval at a future meeting of the Council.]
Tuesday, December 19, 2006,
Thompson Commerce Center, Madison, Wisconsin Attendees:
Biesek, Arthur / League of Wisconsin Municipalities - P;
Boehnen,
Thomas / American Society of Plumbing Engineers - Wisconsins - P;
Casey,
Patrick / Wisconsin State AFL-CIO - P; Jenkins, Hal / City of
Milwaukee
- P; Jones Dave; Kowalke, Gary / Plumbing Heating and Cooling
Contractors Milwaukee Plumbing Association - Wisconsin - A;
Kuhn, Jeff
/ Plumbing Mechanical Sheet Metal Contractors Alliance - P;
Petrowitsch, Rudolf / American Society of Sanitary Engineers -
Wisconsin - P; Shumann, Gene / Shumann and Associates - P;
Viola, David
/ Plumbing Manufacturers Institute - A; Zoulek, Joseph Plumbing Heating
and Cooling Contractors Milwaukee Plumbing Association -
Wisconsin -
P.
P/A/Ex/Alt
= present, absent, excused, sent alternate.
Alternates
and Guests: Bolt, Jeff / Wisconsin Healthcare Engineers;
Fulkerson,
James / Wisconsin Healthcare Engineers; Otter, Marcella / UW
Madison;
Stein, Joe / Madison Water Utility; Husar, Richard / City of Milwaukee;
Thomas, Alan / Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute; Piskula, Jim / Badgerland
Trading Company; Pagel, Darin / Northlands UDC Inspector.
S&B
staff: Docken, Lynita / Program Manager - Plumbing / Pools; Kaminski,
Roman / Program Manager - Powts; Miller, Jim / Plumbing Section Chief;
Oremus, Don / Plumbing Consultant; Beckwith, Mike / Product
Reviewer.
1.
Welcome, Introductions and Announcements: Meeting was called
to
order at 9:05 a.m. Boehnen welcomed the members and asked
that
everyone introduce themselves.
2.
Public
Input: Two statements were made. a.
Support was
offered for the Affidavit of
Testing?
concept that was to be
discussed
by council members. Flexibility for rural inspectors is
needed
due to size of territory covered and need for timely
inspections.
b. Concern was offered about disposal of chemicals into
plumbing
systems. Federal Environmental Protection Agency and
Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources are beginning to work on this
issue. How hospitals are required to handle and dispose of
chemicals was used as an example of the complexity of this issue.
3.
Commerce / Agency Update: Miller and Docken provided the
Commerce
update. Miller discussed the stop work/stop use process being
implemented by the department. He also discussed plan review
workload issues and the web-based application process being
implemented. Docken discussed multi-purpose piping as related
to
the 2006 IBC. She also mentioned that the storm
code? will be
effective 04/01/07 and that the four-year license is drawing
attention
from some that are attempting to budget based on the new fee structure.
4.
Progress Report Approval: The previous meeting summary was
approved with one minor revision.
5.
Code Revision Suggestion List Review: The suggestion list
with
rankings developed by council members was distributed. The
top
ranked issues will be reviewed at a future council meeting.
6.
Affidavit of Testing: Council members agreed that the concept
had
merit and that a code revision should be made to allow for use of an
affidavit under certain conditions.
6.
Air Admittance Valves: Don Oremus provided a handout and
presented background information on valve performance. Jim
Piskula provided a handout and stated support for revising the code to
allow the valves without the need for an alternate product
approval. Council members chose to table further discussion
on
this issue until a future meeting.
7.
Issue List
Discussion: Council members discussed several issues related
to
categories of license needed to perform various tasks.
Discussion
centered on what work a Restricted Appliance plumber could
perform. Other discussion focused on whether there is a need
or
desire to add specialty categories to the Master Plumber
license.
Docken was given an assignment to research Pass/Fail rates for the
master plumber exams.
8. Next Meeting,
Agenda and
Assignments: The next meeting is scheduled for February 27,
2007. Agenda will include further review of the issue
list
and
report out of assignments. [Future meeting date
–
April 18,
2007.]
7. Adjournment: The
meeting adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
Joint Meeting Plumbing Advisory
Code Council (PACC) and PACC Stormwater Workgroup Tuesday, June 22, 2004, 9 am 2:30 pm
Thompson Commerce Center, Room 201 W. Washington Ave., Madison
Wisconsin / / This summary is subject to approval at a
future council meeting.
Joint Meeting Plumbing Advisory Code
Council
(PACC) and PACC Stormwater Workgroup, December
18, 2003, 9 am - 2:30 pm, Thompson Commerce Center, Room
3B, 201 W. Washington Ave., Madison
Plumbing
Council Attendees: Member Name / Representing
P = present; A = absent; Ex = excused, notified staff as
being unable to attend; Alt. = alternate sent.
Biesek, Art / League of Wisconsin Municipalities P
Boehnen, Thomas
Ex Davis, Jim /
Technical Advisor Ex
Kowalke, Gary / Plumbing Contractors A Krowski, Mark / City
of Milwaukee Ex
Kuhn, Jeff / Plbg. & Mech. Heating Contractors P
Macejkovic,
Steve /
Technical Advisor EX
McCullough, Clint / Plumbing Contractors EX Newirth,
Alex /
AFL-CIO Plumbers / Labor ALT
Petrowitsch, Rudy / ASSE EX
Schlieve, Dale / Wisconsin Soc. of Prof. Designers P
Shumann, Gene P
Viola, Dave / PMI A Zoulek, Joe / PHCC
& MPA of Wisconsin P
Stormwater
Workgroup:
Mazen M. Amer A Tom C. Cottreau EX
Wisconsinllie Gonwa
A Dan Jensen EX Bob Pups EX Mary
Ann Lowndes A
Jim Wolf P
Guests:
Luedeke,
Jim / Wausau Concrete P
Boldt, Jeff / WHEA P
Fulkerson, James /
WHEA P Stein,
Joe / Madison Water Utility P
Staff:
Docken, Lynita
P MacCubbin,
Jean P Miller,
Jim P Stanlick,
Harold P Mike
Beckwith P Glen
Jones A Lenny
Kanter P Dan
Kraft P Jim
Zickert P
1. Welcome,
Introductions, Announcements and Review of Agenda:
In the absence of the chair Tom Boehnen, Joe Zoulek opened the meeting
at 9:10 a.m.; there were no announced changes to the agenda.
Self-introductions of attendees were made at this time.
2. Period
for Public Comment:
Joe Stein from the Madison Water Utility brought up a number of items
for future code revision consideration. He noted that they are seeing a
number of new labs where containment would be needed; these labs are
usually ones where various research is being undertaken Wisconsinth
regard to
bio-hazards and grants under homeland security or NIH requirements.
Most have toxic environments and are multiple labs, being in suites for
example as at the new UW Veterinary Medicine Bldg. Discussion followed
and Docken summarized that these issues could be considered for the
next "code fix-up package " planned for after the stormwater rules
become effective.
A second issue Stein brought up was the handling of the
chemical
feed on specific boilers. He proposed some changes for s. Comm 82.41;
discussion followed and this too would be saved for the next rule
revision package.
Shumann brought up the issue regarding the lengthy Appendix
in ch.
Comm 82 and asked if members would like to see it smaller, larger or
done away with altogether. Most agreed that some of the sketches
needed
updating to be more informative and specific to the code section. Most
felt that they routinely refer people with questions to specific
sections of the Appendix. One drawback mentioned was that since only a
few options are listed as sketches, some users feel that other options
are not allowed; this needs to be made clear.
Wisc. Health Care Engineers, would like to see the
council
revisit
the domestic hot water issues for healthcare facilities, particularly
with regard to chlorination systems and the temperature of 140
degree
F. being possibly too high.
3. Approval
of Progress Report of 10/08/03: MOTION by Shumann / Biesek to
accept the progress report as distributed. Passed unanimously.
Zickert noted that s. Comm 82.36 (9) notes a 4-inch sphere; the staff
team has since recommended a 6-inch sphere. The progress report will so
note this more recent recommendation.
4. Commerce
Update:Docken provided the folloWisconsinng reports.
a) Advance Plumbing Credential. Marge Wood of Wisconsin
Technical
College Systems was in attendance to give an update on the most recent
recommendations with regard to post-apprenticeship education and
certificate. Briefly, she noted that the idea came from a desire to
promote the trade, elevate the industry and career path as well as
promote life-long learning. It is just another mechanism to
institutionalize continuing education. The certificate upon completion,
in any of the 6 tracks would be issued by Dept. of Workforce
Development. Incentives should be given to complete the courses, such
as opting out of some testing for the MP exam. There is some statutory
language with regard to MP 'test' and the two departments are
looking
at ways to either change or interpret this rule.
Questions and answers followed: - How will
the
course be offered? Both online and classroom. - What if
any tie
in
to BS or AS degree? It is planned that one could get an AS in addition
to the certificate.
- What are the tracks? Business, mechanical and environmental.
-
How will the
apprentice instructors be notified? Most already are aware of the plan;
some will be teaching the courses.
- Will any other state recognize the classes or the certificate?
Yes,
the group did an evaluation of neighboring states and it appears that
these courses would apply there as well.
- Is the test for MP the same if someone obtained this certificate? It
is planned that perhaps portions of the MP exam may be waived; this is
still being worked out.
-
What are other benefits to such certificate? The MP could expand their
knowledge so they can move from shop to shop or expand business.
- Could these
courses count toward continuing education? Yes, this could be as early
as this spring.
b) Apprentice Fair. Docken reported that she has been working
with
Randy Lorge, tech school instructor, on the idea of having an
Apprentice Fair this spring. One possibly would be that a class could
be a field trip for hands-on learning opportunities; soil infiltration,
friction loss, stormwater and new products were ideas floated.
c) Comm 83 code changes. Docken reported that some fix ups to
this
POWTS chapter will become effective 2/1/04 and Wisconsinll
affect upcoming
continuing education and training.
d) Comm 5 rule revision. Docken reported that this rule
revision
package has been sent to the Legislature to be assigned to committees.
The rule revisions include the continuing education requirements for
sprinkler fitters; grandfathering clause for commercial plumbing
inspector license within a one-year window.
e) Training for state staff. Docken reported that there will
be
stormwater sizing, stormwater modeling and enforcement training for
state staff in March.
f) State law re: one- and 2-family inspections. Docken
reported
that this bill became law for both construction and plumbing inspection
in municipalities of less than 2,500 population. She gave an overview
of how municipalities could opt out and the county previously could do
that work; that option is not longer available and the state plans to
contract with inspection agencies and all municipalities would
not need
to be involved. A question was asked if this included just new
construction or additions/remodels as well. Staff will check on
this
and so communicate.
g) Witer training. Staff are involved in an
aggressive
training
schedule, Miller reported. So far, many of the classes have been
well-attended.
h) Field operations. Stanlick noted that Jim Wehinger is now
back
to work and that most field staff are involved in the winter
training.
i) SB 145 pump installers. A question was asked on the status
of
the proposal regarding (licensing of) pump installers. Docken believed
that the bill may be dead as written; she heard that the WDNR did not
support it in it's current form.
5. Preliminary
Public Hearing Draft, ss. Comm 82.35- 82.365.
An updated draft of the public hearing draft was circulated and Docken
reported that the three umbrella councils (UDC, MFDCC and CBCC) had
reviewed it and gave their 'go ahead' to submit for public hearing
(although no formal votes were taken at each meeting). She then
proceeded to go through the items that were presented to those groups
with an accompanied PowerPoint presentation. She noted that the
plan is
to have the draft effective well before the October 1, 2004 date of the
one acre or less rule.
Questions were asked about how this rule would effect
municipalities that already have rules in place, like Milwaukee, for
example. Docken felt that staff will learn more about these
circumstances during the upcoming training sessions on stormwater; most
municipalities, she thought, did not have rules regarding the plumbing
option of stormwater. Also asked was how to handle the plumbing
portion? Docken noted that ch. NR 151 is a minimum standard and would
apply on sites where EPA rules are required.
Table 2.64-1 piping. The change provides for plan review fees
for
stormwater connected to a building based on piping. It was noted that
another amendment should be made for clearwater drain systems.
Tables 82.20-1 and -2. Changes were made to outline when
submittals
are required for stormwater and clearwater drain systems by the depart
and agents, or agents with permission from the department.
s. Comm 82.36(3) Design. Three requirements are listed,
Docken
noted: the 100 year storm event and a sketch was drafted for
clarification; the 10 year event and training will show how to
read
rainfall rate.
Table 82.70-1. Change was made so that reuse would not be
allowed for food crops.
s. Comm 82.36 (5) flow rate calculations. Docken noted that
the
volume calculation would be based on the 2 year, 2-hour and 100 year,
2-hour as per WDNR. March training on SLAMM would be helpful here.
s. Comm 82.36 (6) All tables have been updated based on
pitch, diameter and gpm.
s. Comm 82.36 (6) (c). The Infiltration workgroup changed
this to be the 24-hour storm event.
s. Comm 82.36 (7) (d) 6. Six inches of storage would be
allowed in parking lots.
s. Comm 82.36 (9) (b) 3. A lengthy discussion took place with
regard to inlets and grates. Docken focused on ADA requirements with
Neenah Foundry and the Milwaukee code; now both allow the passage of a
6-inch sphere like the building code. A sketch drafted for use in the
Appendix was discussed and it was noted that it was confusing since the
grate is not horizontal, on a walking surface and appeared to depict
the pipe apron Wisconsinth a grate. Docken will update the
sketch for use in
the Appendix.
s. Comm 82.36 (9) (e) 3. A. A question was asked about the
adoption
of ANSI A117.95 (1998) as in the building code vs. references to ADA.
s. Comm 82.36 (13)(b) Sump venting. Discussion followed on
whether
a solid cover required venting. Since Clearwater traps are vented,
sumps can have airtight covers.
s. Comm 82.36 (13) Operation and maintenance plans. Docken
circulated a copy of a plan she obtained from a stormwater submittal; a
similar one-page plan would be submitted for such a stormwater drain
system.
s. Comm 82.365 Infiltration for stormwater and clear water.
Docken
noted that most of the investigative information gathered would be
based on ch. Comm 85 soil evaluation. Discussion followed on the 3 foot
and 5 foot separation distances as well as the ratings for the most
restrictive layer of soil. It was decided to revise Table 82.36-1 and
-2 to reflect the format in Table 83.44 that CSTs are familiar with
using.
Theses were all of the items that Docken presented to the
Umbrella
Councils; members were then asked if there were items they still needed
to discuss.
s. Comm 84.20 (5)(p) 1. Staff Wisconsinll check if ASME valve
worked
for only ASME approved vessel.
Zoulek then asked members if they were ready to move the
package to
public hearing and if so, a motion would be in order. MOTION by Kuhn /
Biesek that the Council agreed to go to public hearing. Passed.
It was then asked when staff thought that date
would be. Docken
noted that Bob DuPont would be reviewing the draft over the
holidays
and MacCubbin estimated that possibly mid-March for a public hearing
date.
6. Next
Meeting(s) and Proposed Agenda: No future meetings were set.
A meeting would be convened after comments from the public hearing are
received.
MacCubbin queried the members in attendance about their
desire on
how they would like to receive the agenda and progress reports in the
future. The rules are as follows: Most had access to web; about half
wanted the e-mail and hard copies (as how they receive this information
now); the other half wanted hard copies.
7. Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned on a motion by Kuhn / Shumann at 2 p.m.
Submitted by: Jean MacCubbin, Code Consultant to the Council.
[This progress was approved at the 06/22/04 Council meeting.]
Joint Meeting
Plumbing Advisory Code Council (PACC) and PACC Stormwater Workgroup
Wednesday, October 8, 2003,
9:00 am - 2:30 pm, Thompson Commerce Center, Rm 3B, 201 W. Washington
Ave., Madison
Member
Name / Representing P/A
Biesek, Art / League of Wisconsin Municipalities P Boehnen,
Thomas Ex
Davis, Jim /
Technical Advisor Ex
Kowalke, Gary / Plumbing Contractors A Krowski, Mark / City
of Milwaukee Ex
Kuhn, Jeff / Plbg. & Mech. Heating Contractors P
Macejkovic,
Steve /
Technical Advisor EX
McCullough, Clint / Plumbing Contractors EX Newirth,
Alex /
AFL-CIO Plumbers / Labor ALT
Petrowitsch, Rudy / ASSE EX
Schlieve, Dale / Wisconsin Soc. of Prof. Designers P
Shumann, Gene P
Viola, Dave / PMI A
Zoulek,
Joe / PHCC
& MPA of Wisconsin P
Guests
Luedeke, Jim / Wausau Concrete P Boldt, Jeff / WHEA P
Fulkerson, James /
WHEA P Stein,
Joe / Madison Water Utility P
Pody, Louie (alt. Local 75)
Wood, Marge / WTSC P
Stormwater
Workgroup
Bob Pups EX
Mazen M. Amer A
Tom C. Cottreau EX
Wisconsinllie Gonwa A
Dan Jensen EX
Mary Ann Lowndes A
Jim Wolf P
Staff
P/A
Docken, Lynita P
MacCubbin, Jean P
Miller, Jim P
Stanlick, Harold P
Mike Beckwith P
Glen Jones A
Lenny Kanter P
Dan Kraft P Jim
Zickert P
P = present; A = absent; Ex = excused, notified staff as
being unable to attend; Alt. = alternate sent.
1. Welcome,
Introductions, Announcements and Review of Agenda:
In the absence of the chair Tom Boehnen, Joe Zoulek opened the meeting
at 9:10 a.m.; there were no announced changes to the agenda.
Self-introductions of attendees were made at this time.
2. Period
for Public Comment:
Joe Stein from the Madison Water Utility brought up a number of items
for future code revision consideration. He noted that they are seeing a
number of new labs where containment would be needed; these labs are
usually ones where various research is being undertaken Wisconsinth
regard to
bio-hazards and grants under homeland security or NIH requirements.
Most have toxic environments and are multiple labs, being in suites for
example as at the new UW Veterinary Medicine Bldg. Discussion followed
and Docken summarized that these issues could be considered for the
next "code fix-up package " planned for after the stormwater rules
become effective.
A second issue Stein brought up was the handling of the
chemical
feed on specific boilers. He proposed some changes for s. Comm 82.41;
discussion followed and this too would be saved for the next rule
revision package.
Shumann brought up the issue regarding the lengthy Appendix
in ch.
Comm 82 and asked if members would like to see it smaller, larger or
done away with altogether. Most agreed that some of the sketches
needed
updating to be more informative and specific to the code section. Most
felt that they routinely refer people with questions to specific
sections of the Appendix. One drawback mentioned was that since only a
few options are listed as sketches, some users feel that other options
are not allowed; this needs to be made clear.
WHEA, Wisconsin. Health Care Engineers, would like to see
the
council
revisit the domestic hot water issues for healthcare facilities,
particularly with regard to chlorination systems and the
temperature of
140 degree F. being possibly too high.
3. Approval
of Progress Report of 10/08/03: MOTION by Shumann / Biesek to
accept the progress report as distributed. assed unanimously.
Zickert noted that s. Comm 82.36 (9) notes a 4-inch sphere; the staff
team has since recommended a 6-inch sphere. The progress report winll
so
note this more recent recommendation.
4. Commerce
Update: Docken provided the following reports.
a) Advance Plumbing Credential. Marge Wood of Wisconsin.
Technical
College Systems was in attendance to give an update on the most recent
recommendations with regard to post-apprenticeship education and
certificate. Briefly, she noted that the idea came from a desire to
promote the trade, elevate the industry and career path as well as
promote life-long learning. It is just another mechanism to
institutionalize continuing education. The certificate upon completion,
in any of the 6 tracks would be issued by DWD, Dept. of Workforce
Development. Incentives should be given to complete the courses, such
as opting out of some testing for the MP exam. There is some statutory
language with regard to MP 'test' and the two departments are
looking
at ways to either change or interpret this rule.
Questions and answers followed:
How Wisconsinll the course be offered? Both on-line and
classroom.
What if any tie in to BS or AS degree? It is planed that one
could get an AS in addition to the certificate.
What are the tracks? Business, mechanical and environmental.
How winll the apprentice instructors be notified? Most
already
are aware of the plan; some Wisconsinll be teaching the courses.
Will any other state recognize the classes or the
certificate? Yes,
the group did an evaluation of neighboring states and it appears that
these courses would apply there as well.
Is the test for MP the same if someone obtained this
certificate?
It is planned that perhaps portions of the MP exam may be waived; this
is still being worked out.
What are other benefits to such certificate? The MP could
expand
their knowledge so they can move from shop to shop or expand business.
Could these courses count toward continuing education? Yes,
this could be as early as this spring.
b) Apprentice Fair. Docken reported that she has been working
Wisconsinth
Randy Lorge, tech school instructor, on the idea of having an
Apprentice Fair this spring. One possibly would be that a class could
be a field trip for hands-on learning opportunities; soil infiltration,
friction loss, stormwater and new products were ideas floated.
c) Comm 83 code changes. Docken reported that some fix ups to
this
POWTS chapter will become effective 2/1/04 and will
affect upcoming
continuing education and training.
d) Comm 5 rule revision. Docken reported that this rule
revision
package has been sent to the Legislature to be assigned to committees.
The rule revisions include the continuing education requirements for
sprinkler fitters; grandfathering clause for commercial plumbing
inspector license within a one-year Wisconsinndow.
e) Training for state staff. Docken reported that there will
be
stormwater sizing, stormwater modeling and enforcement training for
state staff in March.
f) State law re: one- and 2-family inspections. Docken
reported
that this bill became law for both construction and plumbing inspection
in municipalities of less than 2,500 population. She gave an overview
of how municipalities could opt out and the county previously could do
that work; that option is not longer available and the state plans to
contract with inspection agencies and all municipalities would
not need
to be involved. A question was asked if this included just new
construction or additions/remodels as well. Staff will check on
this
and so communicate.
g) Winter training. Staff are involved in an
aggressive
training
schedule, Miller reported. So far, many of the classes have been
well-attended.
h) Field operations. Stanlick noted that Jim Wehinger is now
back
to work and that most field staff are involved in the Wisconsinnter
training.
i) SB 145 pump installers. A question was asked on the status
of
the proposal regarding (licensing of) pump installers. Docken believed
that the bill may be dead as written; she heard that the WDNR did not
support it in it's current form.
5. Preliminary
Public Hearing Draft, ss. Comm 82.35- 82.365.
An updated draft of the public hearing draft was circulated and Docken
reported that the three umbrella councils (UDC, MFDCC and CBCC) had
reviewed it and gave their 'go ahead' to submit for public hearing
(although no formal votes were taken at each meeting). She then
proceeded to go through the items that were presented to those groups
Wisconsinth an accompanied PowerPoint presentation. She noted that the
plan is
to have the draft effective well before the October 1, 2004 date of the
one acre or less rule.
Questions were asked about how this rule would effect
municipalities that already have rules in place, like Milwaukee, for
example. Docken felt that staff will learn more about these
circumstances during the upcoming training sessions on stormwater; most
municipalities, she thought, did not have rules regarding the plumbing
option of stormwater. Also asked was how to handle the plumbing
portion? Docken noted that ch. NR 151 is a minimum standard and would
apply on sites where EPA rules are required.
Table 2.64-1 piping. The change provides for plan review fees
for
stormwater connected to a building based on piping. It was noted that
another amendment should be made for clearwater drain systems.
Tables 82.20-1 and -2. Changes were made to outline when
submittals
are required for stormwater and clearwater drain systems by the depart
and agents, or agents with permission from the department.
s. Comm 82.36(3) Design. Three requirements are listed,
Docken
noted: the 100 year storm event and a sketch was drafted for
clarification; the 10 year event and training will show how to
read
rainfall rate.
Table 82.70-1. Change was made so that reuse would not be
allowed for food crops.
s. Comm 82.36 (5) flow rate calculations. Docken noted that
the
volume calculation would be based on the 2 year, 2-hour and 100 year,
2-hour as per WDNR. March training on SLAMM would be helpful here.
s. Comm 82.36 (6) All tables have been updated based on
pitch, diameter and gpm.
s. Comm 82.36 (6) (c). The Infiltration workgroup changed
this to be the 24-hour storm event.
s. Comm 82.36 (7) (d) 6. Six inches of storage would be
allowed in parking lots.
s. Comm 82.36 (9) (b) 3. A lengthy discussion took place with
regard to inlets and grates. Docken focused on ADA requirements with
Neenah Foundry and the Milwaukee code; now both allow the passage of a
6-inch sphere like the building code. A sketch drafted for use in the
Appendix was discussed and it was noted that it was confusing since the
grate is not horizontal, on a walking surface and appeared to depict
the pipe apron with a grate. Docken will update the
sketch for use in
the Appendix.
s. Comm 82.36 (9) (e) 3. A. A question was asked about the
adoption
of ANSI A117.95 (1998) as in the building code vs. references to ADA.
s. Comm 82.36 (13)(b) Sump venting. Discussion followed on
whether
a solid cover required venting. Since Clearwater traps are vented,
sumps can have airtight covers.
s. Comm 82.36 (13) Operation and maintenance plans. Docken
circulated a copy of a plan she obtained from a stormwater submittal; a
similar one-page plan would be submitted for such a stormwater drain
system.
s. Comm 82.365 Infiltration for stormwater and clear water.
Docken
noted that most of the investigative information gathered would be
based on ch. Comm 85 soil evaluation. Discussion followed on the 3 foot
and 5 foot separation distances as well as the ratings for the most
restrictive layer of soil. It was decided to revise Table 82.36-1 and
-2 to reflect the format in Table 83.44 that CSTs are familiar with
using.
Theses were all of the items that Docken presented to the
Umbrella
Councils; members were then asked if there were items they still needed
to discuss.
s. Comm 84.20 (5)(p) 1. Staff will check if ASME valve
worked
for only ASME approved vessel.
Zoulek then asked members if they were ready to move the
package to
public hearing and if so, a motion would be in order. MOTION by Kuhn /
Biesek that the Council agreed to go to public hearing. Passed.
It was then asked when staff thought that date
would be. Docken
noted that Bob DuPont would be reviewing the draft over the
holidays
and MacCubbin estimated that possibly mid-March for a public hearing
date.
6. Next
Meeting(s) and Proposed Agenda: No future meetings were set.
A meeting would be convened after comments from the public hearing are
received.
MacCubbin queried the members in attendance about their
desire on
how they would like to receive the agenda and progress reports in the
future. The rules are as follows: Most had access to web; about
½
wanted the e-mail and hard copies (as how they receive this information
now); the other ½ wanted hard copies.
7. Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned on a motion by Kuhn / Shumann at 2:00 p.m.
Submitted by: Jean MacCubbin, Code Consultant to the Council.
[This
progress will be the subject of approval at a future Council
meeting.]
Email this page's
manager, Amanda Berry, amanda.berry@wisconsin.gov
or 608-267-7909.
The Department of Commerce Safety and Buildings
Division is an
equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance
to access services or need material in an alternate format, please
contact us, 608-266-3151, TTY 608-264-8777, or amanda.berry@wisconsin.gov
|